1/2/2023 0 Comments Deep blue beats kasparov chess![]() He pointed to the speed at which vaccines were developed in response to Covid-19, a lightning effort compared to work fighting earlier diseases, as something that made him hopeful about the power of innovation.īut he called for better regulation worldwide to help limit the negative impact of social media and other evolving technologies. "Humanity always wins with more technology brought in." I don't want to sound callous - people will lose jobs. ![]() Kasparov might be described as a techno-optimist, but he does not totally dismiss the fears of AI naysayers who worry that robots will replace jobs once done by humans, from factory workers to truck drivers. While Terminator-style robo-assassins remain the stuff of science fiction, human rights groups are already pushing for international laws to restrict the use of so-called "killer robots", predicting that AI will transform warfare in the years to come.Īt the Web Summit, meanwhile, tech gurus have spent the week discussing more positive potential applications of AI, from intelligent chatbots that boost our mental health to sorting plastic waste. The true threat, the Kremlin critic says, comes from "the dictatorial, totalitarian countries and the terrorists who will use this technology to harm us". The real danger comes not from killer robots but from people - because people still have a monopoly on evil." "There is simply no evidence that machines are threatening us. Whether you like it or not, it's happening," he said. "We live in a world where machines are playing bigger and bigger roles. When he wasn't busy taking on 10 simultaneous chess opponents at Lisbon's Web Summit this week - handily beating them all in 45 minutes - he spoke to AFP about AI's growing role in society. Kasparov has remained fascinated by technology since his famous matches against IBM's Deep Blue computer in the 1990s. Even in the first game of the match, Kasparov started to become distracted by second-guessing how capable the machine might be.Russian chess legend Garry Kasparov was beaten by a supercomputer - but when it comes to artificial intelligence, he is firmly convinced that it's the humans who pose the real threat. In reality, however, it was sitting idly by, knowing exactly what to play, just letting the clock tick down. It seemed to confirm what Kasparov thought he knew that he’d successfully dragged the game into a position where the number of possibilities was so mind-bogglingly large that Deep Blue couldn’t make a sensible decision. From Kasparov’s end of the table, the delays made it look as if the machine was struggling, churning through more and more calculations. During their infamous six-game match, the machine would occasionally hold off from declaring its move once a calculation had finished, sometimes for several minutes. In order to beat Kasparov, Deep Blue had to understand him not simply as a highly efficient processor of brilliant chess moves, but as a human being.įor a start, the IBM engineers made the brilliant decision to design Deep Blue to appear more uncertain than it was. That symbolic victory, of machine over man, which in many ways marked the start of the algorithmic age, was down to far more than sheer raw computing power. The outcome of the match is well known, but the story behind how Deep Blue secured its win is less widely appreciated. But when IBM’s Deep Blue faced Kasparov in the famous match of May 1997, the machine was immune to such tactics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |